News

from TUM-International

IGNITE 2027: registration open, 10% early bird rate until 15 November

Are you an innovation leader at a university, public agency, or technology hub? Join us in March in Munich for our TUMint flagship executive training programme on catalysing innovation ecosystems!

Registration

Plea­se cont­act the TUMint team via academy@tum-international.com for any ques­ti­ons or inte­rest in the pro­gram. Regis­tra­ti­ons befo­re the 15th of Novem­ber recei­ve a 10% dis­count.

Lear­ning from the insi­de: why TUM Inter­na­tio­nal is brin­ging inno­va­ti­on lea­ders to Munich

In March 2027, TUM Inter­na­tio­nal opens the Munich inno­va­ti­on eco­sys­tem to a cohort of seni­or lea­ders from uni­ver­si­ties, com­pa­nies and public insti­tu­ti­ons. Its flag­ship exe­cu­ti­ve pro­gram­me, IGNITE, starts from a simp­le obser­va­ti­on: eco­sys­tems are far easier to admi­re than to build.

On Fred­die-Mer­cu­ry-Stra­ße, in Munich’s Krea­tiv­quar­tier, stands a five-storey buil­ding that the City of Munich and Unter­neh­mer­TUM ope­ned in June 2021 as the Munich Urban Colab. Foun­ding teams work on one flo­or, city depart­ments test smart-city ide­as on ano­ther, and cor­po­ra­te part­ners book rooms for work­shops with start-ups. TUM Inter­na­tio­nal has its offices here as well. For many inter­na­tio­nal visi­tors, this buil­ding is the first place whe­re the abs­tract idea of an inno­va­ti­on eco­sys­tem takes on a phy­si­cal shape.

Tho­se visi­tors tend to arri­ve with the same ques­ti­ons. How did a public tech­ni­cal uni­ver­si­ty beco­me one of Euro­pe’s most pro­duc­ti­ve sources of start-ups? Who made which decis­i­ons, and in what order? And could any of it work at home? IGNITE, a three-day exe­cu­ti­ve pro­gram­me from 15 to 17 March 2027, is TUM Inter­na­tio­nal’s attempt to ans­wer tho­se ques­ti­ons in depth, with the peo­p­le who were invol­ved.

A con­cept that is easy to name and hard to build

Few terms appear in inno­va­ti­on stra­te­gies as often as “eco­sys­tem”, and few are used as loo­se­ly. In a wide­ly cited con­cep­tu­al review, Ove Gran­strand and Mar­cus Hol­gers­son (2020) pro­po­se a nar­rower defi­ni­ti­on: an inno­va­ti­on eco­sys­tem is the evol­ving set of actors, acti­vi­ties and arte­facts, tog­e­ther with the insti­tu­ti­ons and rela­ti­ons bet­ween them, that mat­ter for the inno­va­ti­ve per­for­mance of an actor or a popu­la­ti­on of actors. The value of the defi­ni­ti­on lies in whe­re it directs atten­ti­on. It looks past indi­vi­du­al orga­ni­sa­ti­ons to the con­nec­tions that link them.

That per­spec­ti­ve has a lon­ger histo­ry in rese­arch on uni­ver­si­ties and indus­try. The Tri­ple Helix model deve­lo­ped by Hen­ry Etz­ko­witz and Loet Ley­des­dorff (2000) descri­bes inno­va­ti­on as the pro­duct of inter­ac­tion bet­ween uni­ver­si­ties, indus­try and govern­ment, in which each part­ly takes on roles tra­di­tio­nal­ly held by the others. Two years ear­lier, Bur­ton Clark had stu­di­ed five Euro­pean uni­ver­si­ties that reinven­ted them­sel­ves during the 1980s and 1990s, among them War­wick and Chal­mers. His con­clu­si­on was that chan­ge rare­ly came from a sin­gle initia­ti­ve. It requi­red a streng­the­ned stee­ring core, a gro­wing peri­phery of units working with exter­nal part­ners, a broa­der fun­ding base, aca­de­mic depart­ments wil­ling to take part, and a cul­tu­re that held the­se ele­ments tog­e­ther.

Munich as a case

Munich offers an unu­su­al oppor­tu­ni­ty to obser­ve the­se dyna­mics at clo­se ran­ge. TUM has descri­bed its­elf as “The Entre­pre­neu­ri­al Uni­ver­si­ty” for years. Unter­neh­mer­TUM, foun­ded in 2002 by the entre­pre­neur Susan­ne Klat­ten in clo­se part­ner­ship with the uni­ver­si­ty, sup­ports foun­ding teams from a first idea to mar­ket ent­ry. Ven­ture Labs orga­nis­ed around spe­ci­fic tech­no­lo­gy fields bring rese­ar­chers, foun­ders and indus­try part­ners tog­e­ther. Accor­ding to figu­res published by TUM and its part­ners, more than 1,100 start-ups have emer­ged from the uni­ver­si­ty, with a com­bi­ned valua­ti­on abo­ve €10 bil­li­on. Glo­bal com­pa­nies, a sta­te govern­ment inves­t­ing in arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence and deep tech, and foun­da­ti­ons with long time hori­zons com­ple­te the set­ting.

Describ­ing such a sys­tem is con­sider­a­b­ly easier than repro­du­cing it. Legal frame­works, fun­ding cul­tures and regio­nal his­to­ries dif­fer, and an arran­ge­ment that works in Bava­ria may stall else­whe­re. This is the start­ing point for the design of IGNITE. The pro­gram­me pres­ents Munich as a case to be exami­ned rather than a tem­p­la­te to be instal­led, inclu­ding the decis­i­ons that took years and the ques­ti­ons that remain open.

From indi­vi­du­al visits to a pro­gram­me

TUM Inter­na­tio­nal GmbH was foun­ded in 2007 as a whol­ly owned sub­si­dia­ry of the Tech­ni­cal Uni­ver­si­ty of Munich. With part­ners around the world, it works on uni­ver­si­ty site deve­lo­p­ment, know­ledge and tech­no­lo­gy trans­fer, inno­va­ti­on eco­sys­tem acce­le­ra­ti­on, and talent manage­ment. In the­se pro­jects, one request comes up again and again: part­ners want to see the Munich eco­sys­tem for them­sel­ves and speak with the peo­p­le who run it. Until now, such visits were arran­ged one by one. IGNITE gathers them into a struc­tu­red pro­gram­me with a cohort, a cur­ri­cu­lum and a defi­ned result.

The three days fol­low a deli­be­ra­te sequence. The first exami­nes the Munich model its­elf: how it is gover­ned, whe­re the incen­ti­ves lie, and how stra­tegy is set. The second turns to the links bet­ween sci­ence and indus­try, with a visit to a cor­po­ra­te site, a ses­si­on with the Bava­ri­an AI Agen­cy, and prac­ti­cal work on tech­no­lo­gy trans­fer and intellec­tu­al pro­per­ty. On the third day, par­ti­ci­pan­ts shift the focus to their own insti­tu­ti­ons. In an Action Lab, each of them deve­lo­ps a road­map, pres­ents it to the cohort for cri­tique, and com­mits to con­cre­te first steps.

The con­tri­bu­tors reflect the breadth of the eco­sys­tem. They include Prof. Dr. Hel­mut Schö­nen­ber­ger of Unter­neh­mer­TUM; Prof. Dr. Ger­hard Kra­mer and Prof. Dr. Isa­bell Wel­pe of TUM; Prof. Dr. Gun­ther Friedl of the Die­ter Schwarz Foun­da­ti­on; Dr. Micha­el Klim­ke of the Bava­ri­an AI Agen­cy; the foun­der Tho­mas Kirch­ner, who­se com­pa­nies Pro­Glove and YETI grew out of the TUM eco­sys­tem; and Frie­de­ri­ke Het­tin­ger, Mana­ging Direc­tor of TUM Inter­na­tio­nal.

Why the mix of par­ti­ci­pan­ts mat­ters

IGNITE is aimed at vice pre­si­dents for rese­arch and inno­va­ti­on, deans, rec­tors and pro­vosts, heads of tech­no­lo­gy trans­fer, cor­po­ra­te inno­va­ti­on lea­ders, govern­ment inno­va­ti­on leads, regio­nal deve­lo­p­ment agen­ci­es and fun­ders. The com­po­si­ti­on fol­lows from the rese­arch descri­bed abo­ve. If inno­va­ti­on depends on inter­ac­tion bet­ween sec­tors, the peo­p­le who lead tho­se sec­tors gain from lear­ning side by side, and from hea­ring how the same part­ner­ship looks from the other side of the table.

The first cohort, and what fol­lows

The 2027 cohort is the first. TUM Inter­na­tio­nal will coll­ect feed­back from par­ti­ci­pan­ts and con­tri­bu­tors during and after the pro­gram­me and use it to shape later edi­ti­ons. Alum­ni fol­low-up is part of the for­mat, so that the road­maps draf­ted in Munich can be revi­si­ted once par­ti­ci­pan­ts are back at their desks.

Whe­ther tho­se road­maps chan­ge any­thing will be deci­ded at home, in the insti­tu­ti­ons whe­re the par­ti­ci­pan­ts work. What three days in Munich can pro­vi­de is a clo­se view of how one eco­sys­tem actual­ly func­tions, con­ver­sa­ti­ons with tho­se who built it, and a group of peers working on the same pro­blem in very dif­fe­rent places.

IGNITE 2027 takes place from 15 to 17 March 2027 in Munich. Pro­gram­me details, con­tri­bu­tors and regis­tra­ti­on: https://tum-international.com/en/contact/

Refe­ren­ces

Clark, B. R. (1998). Crea­ting Entre­pre­neu­ri­al Uni­ver­si­ties: Orga­niza­tio­nal Pathways of Trans­for­ma­ti­on. Oxford: Per­ga­mon for the Inter­na­tio­nal Asso­cia­ti­on of Uni­ver­si­ties.

Etz­ko­witz, H., & Ley­des­dorff, L. (2000). The dyna­mics of inno­va­ti­on: From Natio­nal Sys­tems and “Mode 2” to a Tri­ple Helix of uni­ver­si­ty, indus­try and govern­ment rela­ti­ons. Rese­arch Poli­cy, 29(2), 109 to 123.

Gran­strand, O., & Hol­gers­son, M. (2020). Inno­va­ti­on eco­sys­tems: A con­cep­tu­al review and a new defi­ni­ti­on. Tech­no­va­ti­on, 90/91, 102098.